It's interesting that we've moved from Marvel last week (your domain) to Star Trek this week, where I'd imagine I'm probably more versed since I don't remember hearing you mentioning it in your littany of stuff you like, Digsy.
Spoilers throughout
I can't decide how I feel about this film. It is a bold re-thinking of Star Trek, so much so that it begs the question, "Is it really Star Trek?" Or is it a sort of Lucasized version of Star Trek? (the good Lucas, not the bad Lucas) The fact that the whole future, everything we've seen and loved, is washed away with this film to boldly experiment with something else saddens me that this new future doesn't hold room for much of what I liked so much in the other series. It's also hard to imagine these guys doing all those Federation-y sit down and talk about stuff approach that made Star Trek rise above most Hollywood dreck by being brave enough to be heady and controversial. And I'm fine with no Shatner, but a British Sarek and a gray haired Christopher Pike? The latter hurt a little, the former a lot. But I was thankful for the few winks in the canon we had, particularly the bugs from the Wrath of Khan and the fact that Pike was in a wheelchair (if only they'd reduced his speech to a blinking red light, beautifully parodied in Futurama, it would have been even better). The mention of the Captain from the series Enterprise was a nice nod, but Scotty destroying his beloved fan-favorite beagle was a downright sneer at Trek fans.
I'll have to think about this. I watched I, II, III and VI this week to get ready, and now I feel like I need to watch some more of them, even if it's just to mourn the fact that the old timeline has been destroyed.